Heterosexual: dummy variable in which intimate fraction = 0 and heterosexual = 1

Heterosexual: dummy variable in which intimate fraction = 0 and heterosexual = 1

M = mean. SD = standard deviation. Sk = skewness. SE = standard error; # = number. Usage time, measured in months. Use frequency, measured as times/week. Men: dummy variable where women = 0 and men = 1. Age, measured in years. Bold values correspond to statistically significant coefficients (p < 0.05).

Into half a dozen noticed attributes, four regression activities showed extreme abilities that have ps ? 0.036 (all but how many romantic relationships, p = 0.253), however, all Roentgen a good d j 2 was in fact quick (variety [0.01, 0.10]). Considering the large number of estimated coefficients, we minimal our very own awareness of those individuals mathematically extreme. Men tended to use Tinder for a significantly longer time (b = 2.14, p = 0.032) and you will gathered even more family members via Tinder (b = 0.70, p = 0.008). Sexual fraction participants found a much bigger number of people traditional (b = ?step 1.33, p = 0.029), got more sexual dating (b = ?0.98, p = 0.026), and you can gathered much more family relations through Tinder (b = ?0.81, p = 0.001). Old users used Tinder for extended (b = 0.51, p = 0.025), with increased regularity (b = 0.72, p = 0.011), and you can satisfied more people (b = 0.29, p = 0.040).

Because of the desire of your own manuscript, i merely discussed the differences considering Tinder use

Outcome of the brand new regression activities getting Tinder intentions and their descriptives receive into the Dining table cuatro . The outcome have been bought within the descending buy by the rating means. The intentions which have large function had been interest (Meters = 4.83; reaction level 1–7), interest (Yards = 4.44), and you can sexual direction (Meters = 4.15). Individuals with down mode was basically peer stress (Yards = 2.20), old boyfriend (Meters = 2.17), and you will belongingness (Yards = step one.66).

Table cuatro

M = mean. SD = standard deviation. Sk = skewness. SE = standard error. Men: dummy variable where women = 0 and men = 1. Age, measured in years. Dependent variables were standardized. Motives were ordered by their means. Bold values correspond to statistically significant coefficients (p < 0.05).

For the 13 considered motives, seven regression joingy ekÅŸi models showed significant results (ps ? 0.038), and six were statistically nonsignificant (ps ? 0.077). The R a d j 2 tended to be small (range [0.00, 0.13]). Again, we only commented on those statistically significant coefficients (when the overall model was also significant). Women reported higher scores for curiosity (b = ?0.53, p = 0.001), pastime/entertainment (b = ?0.46, p = 0.006), distraction (b = ?0.38, p = 0.023), and peer pressure (b = ?0.47, p = 0.004). For no motive men’s means were higher than women’s. While sexual minority participants showed higher scores for sexual orientation (as could be expected; b = –0.75, p < 0.001) and traveling (b = ?0.37, p = 0.018), heterosexual participants had higher scores for peer pressure (b = 0.36, p = 0.017). Older participants tended to be more motivated by relationship-seeking (b = 0.11, p = 0.005), traveling (b = 0.08, p = 0.035), and social approval (b = 0.08, p = 0.040).

The results for the 10 psychological and psychosexual variables are shown in Table 5 . All the regression models were statistically significant (all ps < 0.001). Again, the R a d j 2 tended to be small, with R a d j 2 in the range [0.01, 0.15]. The other coefficients were less informative, as they corresponded to the effects adjusted for Tinder use. Importantly, Tinder users and nonusers did not present statistically significant differences in negative affect (b = 0.12, p = 0.146), positive affect (b = 0.13, p = 0.113), body satisfaction (b = ?0.08, p = 0.346), or self-esteem as a sexual partner (b = 0.09, p = 0.300), which are the four variables related to the more general evaluation of the self. Tinder users showed higher dissatisfaction with sexual life (b = 0.28, p < 0.001), a higher preoccupation with sex (b = 0.37, p < 0.001), more sociosexual behavior (b = 0.65, p < 0.001), a more positive attitude towards casual sex (b = 0.37, p < 0.001), a higher sociosexual desire (b = 0.52, p < 0.001), and a more positive attitude towards consensual nonmonogamy (b = 0.22, p = 0.005).

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai.